(US) – Alphabet Inc.’s Google recently encountered its most significant antitrust challenge yet when a US federal judge ruled that the company had unlawfully monopolized the online search market. This ruling opens the door for potential remedies that could change the shape of one of the world’s largest tech companies. One option under serious consideration is a forced breakup, which would mark the most impactful antitrust decision involving a US company since telecommunications giant AT&T was dismantled in 1984.
The US Justice Department and attorneys general from several states are now weighing the possibility of asking Judge Amit Mehta, who presided over the case, to require Google to divest key parts of its business. This proposal comes in response to the ruling that Google’s practices have significantly stifled competition in the online search space, where it currently dominates.
In April 2025, Judge Mehta will oversee a trial specifically focused on potential solutions to Google’s monopoly. During this trial, the US government and its allies from various states will argue for effective measures to restore fair competition within the industry. A court mandated breakup could involve Google separating its search engine, advertising business, and other segments of its sprawling operation, which could reshape the competitive landscape of digital services.
Table: Possible Remedies for Google’s Antitrust Case
| Proposed Remedy | Description |
|---|---|
| Forced Breakup | Google may be required to split into smaller companies. |
| Divestment of Assets | Google could sell off specific business units or services. |
| Business Restrictions | Limitations could be placed on certain Google practices. |
The case draws parallels to the antitrust actions taken against AT&T nearly four decades ago, when the telecommunications company was divided to enhance market competition. A similar approach to Google would not only impact the company but could also influence other major players in the tech sector.
