Hon. Ssemujju Nganda Ibrahim questioned the public’s excitement in a recent statement on Capital FM, over funds being deposited into other individuals’ accounts, asserting that as long as the money is allocated in the budget, the method of withdrawal and disbursement shouldn’t be a matter of public concern. This statement marks a significant departure from his previous stance and has sparked various reactions from the public.
Reactions to Hon. Ssemujju’s statement have been mixed. Some individuals, like Andrea Kirungi, echo his sentiments, emphasizing that parliamentary spending aligns with the budget allocations. Conversely, others express skepticism, such as Bradley Carl, who suggests that such statements are kept for record purposes, implying a lack of trust in the transparency of parliamentary finances.
Amos Wekesa criticizes the apparent disconnect between parliamentary spending and the challenges faced by businesses in Uganda, particularly regarding taxation. He questions the priorities of parliamentary members and their understanding of the economic realities faced by ordinary citizens.
Dickson Asiimwe accuses Hon. Ssemujju of hypocrisy, referencing his departure from FDC Najjanankumbi allegedly due to financial reasons. This sentiment is echoed by Eriam Onzima, who urges Hon. Ssemujju to refrain from focusing on the first family in his public appearances and suggests that his constituents in Kira should vote him out in the next election.
Marion Kafuko praises Hon. Ssemujju as a legendary politician but expresses frustration at what she perceives as the country’s political shortcomings. Similarly, Julius K. Warugaba Esq. accuses Hon. Ssemujju of being disingenuous and holding himself to a higher standard of integrity than he maintains.
Nakacwa questions Hon. Ssemujju’s previous criticisms of FDC finances, suggesting that he benefited from parliamentary expenditures himself. Kabtex urges Hon. Ssemujju to reconsider his defense of parliamentary finances to maintain his relevance, while Budha Francis speculates about his influence in parliament.
Namurinda Dickens expresses disappointment in Hon. Ssemujju’s perceived inconsistency and lack of dependability, suggesting that money may have influenced his recent statements. Michael Joel similarly criticizes Hon. Ssemujju for what he perceives as double standards and inconsistency in his political stance.
Overall, Hon. Ssemujju Nganda’s recent statement has sparked a debate on fiscal transparency and political integrity, prompting both support and skepticism from the public. His shifting stance on parliamentary finances has raised questions about his motives and allegiances within the political landscape.
