The recent behaviour of some newly appointed ministers has raised concerns among Ugandans, particularly regarding what some perceive as arrogance, uncoordinated conduct and excessive excitement after assuming public office.
In my view, anyone appointed to a ministerial position should undergo a comprehensive medical and psychological assessment before taking up the office.
Ministerial positions come with enormous responsibilities, and those appointed to them are expected to demonstrate maturity, discipline, sound judgment and the ability to serve the public interest.
The parliamentary vetting process should therefore go beyond examining academic qualifications, political experience and other requirements. It should also ensure that individuals appointed to senior public offices are capable of handling the pressures and responsibilities that come with such positions.
There are cases where some leaders appear to carry personal or family-related frustrations into public service. Such matters should be handled professionally and privately rather than being used to make assumptions about an individual’s mental health.
Parliamentary elections can be won for many reasons, including political popularity and strong support within a constituency. However, holding a ministerial position requires additional responsibilities and a higher level of accountability.
Apart from Hon. Balaam Barugahara and, perhaps, Hon. John Baptist Lokii of Karamoja Affairs, I remain concerned about the performance and conduct of several ministers and whether they are sufficiently focused on the interests of ordinary Ugandans.
Some ministers appear more interested in enjoying the privileges attached to their offices, including escorts and other benefits, than in addressing the challenges facing the people they serve. In some instances, disagreements between public officials and their security personnel have also raised questions about the way authority is exercised.
That is why I believe that before anyone assumes a ministerial position, there should be a proper assessment of their readiness to handle the responsibilities, pressure and public scrutiny that accompany the office.
This is not about discriminating against people with mental-health conditions. Rather, it is about ensuring that every person appointed to a sensitive public position is assessed fairly and professionally, just as people in other demanding professions undergo appropriate evaluations.
Ugandans deserve ministers who can remain calm under pressure, respect the people they serve, work with other institutions and make decisions based on evidence and the national interest.
I am also glad that General Muhoozi Kainerugaba now has a new big book in which the names and conduct of ministers can be carefully recorded and assessed. Such records should help ensure that future appointments are based not only on political considerations but also on demonstrated performance, discipline, integrity and commitment to public service.
