Controversial allegations by media personality Frank Gashumba linking Phaneroo Ministries leader Apostle Grace Lubega to the 2015 murder of Makerere University student Desire Mirembe have sparked debate, with questions emerging over the accuracy of the claims.
Gashumba’s statements have attracted public attention because of the seriousness of the allegations and their connection to one of Uganda’s high-profile murder cases.
However, information circulating about the circumstances surrounding the case reportedly indicates that Matthew Kirabo, who was convicted in connection with Mirembe’s murder, attended an overnight service at Deliverance Church Makerere Hill rather than Phaneroo Ministries.
The reported discrepancy has raised questions about the basis of Gashumba’s claims and whether the church he mentioned has been correctly identified.
Mirembe’s murder in 2015 shocked the country and attracted considerable public attention, particularly because of the circumstances surrounding her death and the subsequent investigation into the case.
The latest controversy has renewed discussions about the responsibility of public figures when making statements involving individuals and institutions in connection with criminal cases.
Although Gashumba’s allegations have generated debate, linking someone to a murder requires credible evidence and should not be based on speculation, personal opinions or unverified accounts.
Apostle Grace Lubega’s alleged connection to the case should therefore be treated cautiously unless supported by verifiable evidence or established findings from relevant investigative and judicial authorities.
The controversy also highlights the importance of distinguishing between documented facts, allegations and public commentary, particularly when discussing a murder that continues to attract public interest.
For Mirembe’s family and those demanding accountability, the priority remains establishing the truth surrounding her death. Justice for Desire Mirembe must be pursued through credible evidence, proper investigations and accountability, rather than claims that risk misleading the public or unfairly damaging reputations.
